Above: Huckabee, in the early stages of nutty throwing. |
"Just so we're all clear: this asshole does not speak for me..."
-Abraham Lincoln
|
"They [people unhappy with the ruling] can do the same thing that Abraham Lincoln did about the Dred Scott decision of 1857...He simply ignored the ruling and said 'That's not correct.'"
-Mike Huckabee, clearly
unclear about a lot of things
unclear about a lot of things
First of all, no they can't. Secondly, yes, he means that Dred Scott case, the one where the Supreme Court said that African Americans couldn't claim citizenship and therefore couldn't sue and therefore should shut up and enjoy being slaves. That's the parallel Mike Huckabee is drawing here, that he's basically Abraham Lincoln, but with homophobia instead of being Abraham Lincoln. So do they not have 8th grade social studies in Arkansas?
Oh...it turns out they do not. In fact, they're a little fuzzy on anything that happened before 6000 years ago. |
Pictured: The same thing as owning people. Source: Mike Huckabee. |
"Hey, guess what? It's option 3. And the new Bible says thou shalt shut up, Mike Huckabee."
-God
|
"If he has so radically changed his view and now believes that same-sex marriage is the best thing that could happen to this country, one of three things is true: He was either lying in 2008, he's lying now, or God rewrote the Bible and Barack Obama is the only one who got the new edition,"
-Mike Huckabee,
flailing wildly
What? I looked him up. He's a country singer and wears a stupid hat. It's not personal. |
Above: Gay people, without whom Mike Huckabee wouldn't have a job. |
But by far my biggest problem with this guy, I mean aside from the homophobia, racism and sexism and the way he tried to pass these traits as a folksy charm, is the fact that marriage equality is like the best thing that could have happened to him, career-wise. Think about it, all he's been doing since the last time he failed to win the GOP nomination is present himself as the underdog fighting the good fight against such social ills as equality and people getting along.
Now he actually is on the loosing side, isn't this what he's wanted all along? I mean, his whole thing is convincing conservative evangelicals that they're being oppressed and that marriage equality is the first step in reviving the Roman practice of feeding Christians to the lions. Isn't that going to be a lot easier to do when they actually are the underdogs, being oppressed by the cruel tyranny of other people getting married?
Now he actually is on the loosing side, isn't this what he's wanted all along? I mean, his whole thing is convincing conservative evangelicals that they're being oppressed and that marriage equality is the first step in reviving the Roman practice of feeding Christians to the lions. Isn't that going to be a lot easier to do when they actually are the underdogs, being oppressed by the cruel tyranny of other people getting married?
I'm not saying we should feed them to lions, I'm just saying that it's going to be easier to get donors when you're not the lion. |
No comments:
Post a Comment